SWAT 4 - The Stetchkov Syndicate

Do you have SWAT 4 - The Stetchkov Syndicate

  • Yes I have this on pc

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No but I can download

    Votes: 13 61.9%
  • No I wont play it I will keep stay in 1.1

    Votes: 5 23.8%
  • Im from COD4 I dont know what is good game

    Votes: 3 14.3%

  • Total voters
    21
Status
Not open for further replies.

Michal

Admin
Oct 18, 2009
2,869
289
41
Im wonder how many of you have SWAT 4 - The Stetchkov Syndicate. I would like if we could start smash and grab mod. That is little bit smilary to VIP but you cant kill case :skull: A lot of 1.1 players playing tss but there actully do exist good server where is allowed spawnraping etc.
 
i play it, it's quite good, Snipers and P90 are useful in swat, and if people in WM play it, it'll be great :D
 
I have it but not installed yet. Never played TSS much...maybe because it works less smoothly on my PC than normal swat4 - damn old PC :D
 
i have, i bought the swat4 gold edition included TSS for 4 euro (and still crash sometimes) :D
 
i have it and played it but its laggy more than 1.1. I dont like it too much. If someone is bored from 1.1 we can always set war server to New maps. Its much bertter than syndicate.
 
cause conf of server is fucked when delta hosted server in tss it work properly like in 1.1
 
i have it, give me a fucking scope and i will kill all bahahah

btw. P90 noob :D

u guys want to open a TSS server? i didnt understood..
 
my experience in 1.1 is -> laggy servers, noob admins and cheaters. but if u guys still want to make some WM invasion in a server to own some gays, count me in :D
 
Xavii said:
my experience in 1.1 is -> laggy servers, noob admins and cheaters. but if u guys still want to make some WM invasion in a server to own some gays, count me in :D

one thing, FU :D
 
i think he mean TSS i think TSS fucked up some engine cfg cause its laggier than whitewolfs mind :D
 
New server is up. IP 78.159.105.11:10780 mod Smash and grab. Lets try new mod :D ty KF and Filix for set up server
 
Status
Not open for further replies.