- May 14, 2010
- 855
- 121
- 30
Alright, I learnt few days ago on oratory courses a nice training-game to enhance your creativity thinking.
Rules:
Some person makes a statement: "I like to ride bycicles"
Next person have to tell, that the statment is GOOD, because... And give another statment as an example. "...Because that makes your legs looks musculed"
And here goes the third person. He have to tell, that previous statment is bad because... "Having muscled legs is BAD, because you looks unnatural"
Next person must say why this is good, the next after him bad and so on.
Prsn1: I like to ride bycicles
Prsn2: Riding bycicle is GOOD, because that makes your legs looks musculed
Prsn3: Having muscled legs is BAD, because you looks unnatural
Prsn4: Looking unnatural is GOOD, because fuck stereotypes
P.S. Try to give logical and adequate replyes, otherwise sense of the game will be lost.
Rules:
Some person makes a statement: "I like to ride bycicles"
Next person have to tell, that the statment is GOOD, because... And give another statment as an example. "...Because that makes your legs looks musculed"
And here goes the third person. He have to tell, that previous statment is bad because... "Having muscled legs is BAD, because you looks unnatural"
Next person must say why this is good, the next after him bad and so on.
Prsn1: I like to ride bycicles
Prsn2: Riding bycicle is GOOD, because that makes your legs looks musculed
Prsn3: Having muscled legs is BAD, because you looks unnatural
Prsn4: Looking unnatural is GOOD, because fuck stereotypes
P.S. Try to give logical and adequate replyes, otherwise sense of the game will be lost.
